Horizontal comparison of two Bluetooth decoding ear devices: Feiao BTR3K VS ES100

Creation Position Statement:junior high school began to toss headphones, like to listen to all kinds of equipment, like the balanced voice, although I did not buy the equipment, but I am willing to use my feelings, as objective and fair as possible to express, good is good, bad is bad, ear receipt

reason for purchase

recently, many fans may be looking forward to the small tail S1 of the letu family like me. it is said that the price is 899 and there are various modes to switch,... At first, the news uploaded on Weibo was sold in early April. Now the news in the official WeChat group is at least 5 months old,

After all, due to the impact of the epidemic, it will take time for factories to resume production.

coincidentally, when I was brushing my microblog, I found a trial of BTR3K with 52 audio networks and signed up decisively,

1. because es100 is a little tired of listening recently, I want to experience the new sound.

2.Feiaoancestral migrant workers tune, also want to judge for themselves, whether it is black or really tune is not hot

Evaluation Ideas

Because the author himself is engaged in software testing related work, I also compared BTR3K and ES100 from the idea of software testing, and drew an xmind. I marked the important parts with a small flag. You can see which aspects are not complete, or you can leave a message. I will help you test.

Static test

First of all, I personally like to take a brief look at the instructions first, because through this process, you can quickly understand the functions of the product and possible problems. (such as charging current and voltage limits, usage, and what functions are not supported)

Supported features:

According to BTR3K's instructions, we can learn several main features of BTR3K:

• Supports USBDAC

• 2.5mm balanced output and 3.5 single-ended output

• You can connect two sets at the same time.cell phone

• can complete the operations of answering phone calls, cutting songs, calling siri, etc. by pressing the key.

• Multiple indicator colors, representing different encoding formats

• on/off tone, connect and disconnect tone, etc

ES100 has similar main functions,:

• less calling siri

• reminder lights are not so rich either.

, I think the following points impressed me deeply:

• ES100 is equipped with a separate button to switch between the previous song and the next song. Compared with BTR3K, it is more efficient to cut songs by pressing the volume +/-for a long time.

• At the same time, it is also because of the above reasons that ES100 can quickly increase the volume by pressing the volume key for a long time, while BTR3 can only be realized by pressing multiple times, which affects the experience when replacing headphones. For example, when I change HD25 from pp8s, es100 can quickly increase the volume, and BTR3K needs to press several times more.

• beep details ES100 is better, the sound of startup and shutdown is different, BTR3K is exactly the same

• However, BTR3K provides more types of beeps, such as the maximum and minimum volume with beeps, while es100 does not

• there is also a small detail, ES100 can control the computer to surf the Internet, easy to cut songs and pause, BTR3K tried not

precautions:

I think there are two important precautions in the BTR3K manual:

• chargercharging

• adjust the volume before listening to songs to avoid hearing damage.

So I usually use the USB port on the computer for charging. The first time I listen to a song, I always turn the volume to the minimum first, and then slowly turn it up.

next is the appearance of the product:

the appearance of the product I divided into two parts, one is the main body, the other is accessories:

Subject:

See the comparison chart below.

Positive effect

Press the right button

bottom

BTR3K adopts the design of double-sided glass and aluminum alloy frame, which looks quite advanced as a whole, especially the small gold mark on the back of the press, with +10 brain

in contrast, ES100 is very mediocre. in the all-plastic body, only the clip part is metal, and the microUSB interface is somewhat backward, but there are also advantages, that is, light

accessories:

BTR3K, detachable back clip, the clip is very tight, the main body can be completely stuck, but it is not very easy to take out, is it more convenient to disassemble by sliding in and out. At first, I thought it could be hung directly on the main body. Later, I found that the lanyard hole was on the back clip. It would be better if users could hang it,Data line, there is nothing to say, can use

BTR3K accessories

ES100, the only accessories are data cables, which can be used, well, that's it

Summarize the advantages and disadvantages

• ES100 has a general appearance and is relatively cheap. The back clip and the body are integrated, which is more convenient to use and light in weight.

• BTR3K, high-end appearance, good feel, good texture, right weight, but the back clip needs to be removed

dynamic testing

dynamic testing is to run the software, give it input and output, and observe the operation. then here, let's use their APP and listen to a few songs to experience it.

Mobile app:

ES100:

The main page of the app

sound control

EQ

More settings

I have to admire the ES100 team here. ES100 APP is highly playable, with basic volume control, EQ, filter settings on the chip, up-frequency settings, and locking the earphone output as 3.5 or 2.5 interfaces.

want to praise is that APP has explained to you at the bottom or side of each setting, what is the purpose of this setting, and it is very considerate. There is also a setting called BATTERY CARE, which can control each battery to be charged to 80% to 90%, thus prolonging the battery life.

BTR3K:

Main page

equalizer

audio

In contrast, BTR3K APP is slightly simple, but it has many functions. For example, DAC working mode can select high performance and low power consumption, turn off or turn on the light effect, set automatic shutdown time, EQ, filtering, etc., but it would be better if it could tell the user what this setting means.

summary: ES100 APP has been iterated and repaired for a long time, with many functions, stability and high playability. BTR3K APP can be designed with more details, such as the battery protection above.

sound quality:

has finally reached the sound quality link that everyone is most concerned about. I have selected five songs with different styles to compare. I often listen to these five capitals. After all, only familiar songs can better recognize the difference.

The following songs are all played by connecting the device to the computer through the data cable and using USBDAC. The earphone used is InEar's PP8s,PP8s is a fairly balanced earphone, which can hear the style and quality of the front end very well.

: Lemon-Yonejin Xuanshi, I like the play "Unnatural Death" very much, and every time Lemon can sound at the right moment, because the voice of the eighth master is very characteristic, so I think this song can test the performance of headphones on male voices.

After comparison, the voice of Mijin Xuanshi under ES100 is more infectious and hoarse. BTR3K is slightly warmer, but the sound density is higher and more audible than ES100. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages.

: redheels-Cai Jianya's song was sung by my brother while playing guitar. Later, I collected it when I thought it was good. Cai Jianya's voice felt lazy but free and easy, so I used this song to test the performance of female voices.

this song, BTR3K is slightly better, with better sound density and atmosphere, while ES100 sounds too dry and cold, not as comfortable as BTR3K.

the third song: Timber-Pitbull/Kesha is a more enthusiastic song, which is popular in Europe and America, so let's test the performance of this style of music.

ES100 wins, the sound field is larger, the rap part is well separated from bgm, the low-frequency drum beat is more flexible, BTR3K is still of high density, but it doesn't make me high while listening.

: the original soundtrack of "the legend of zelda: the breath of the wilderness" is the theme song of the real ending of the breath of the wilderness. I will always remember that link ran to the princess at last, the camera gradually pulled away, and finally fixed on the picture of a quiet princess. This song is pure music, and the latter part also has a relatively large symphonic scene, so it is used to test the big scene and complicated song.

First of all, BTR3K bottom noise can be heard by one ear, and ES100 has to listen carefully. As ES100 has a larger sound field and higher analysis, the flute sound at the beginning is more melodious, and the later big scenes perform better. BTR3K is slightly humbled.

: βί& omicron;& sigmaf; -Xiao Lin's famous magic song of drawing the sword, because the accompaniment is more complicated, it can well test the separation degree and analysis of headphones, etc.

ES100 is slightly better. First of all, the sound field is changed from BTR3K to ES100. The sound field becomes larger and can be heard in one ear. As a result, the sounds are scattered and not cramped in the ear. BTR3K does not perform well because the sound field is relatively small but the sound density is relatively high. It does not bring me the feeling of "giving a salute to the birth of the king" when watching.

:

Personal Comprehensive Evaluation

BTR3K: The sound is thick, the density is large, the sound field performance is general, the analysis is general, the separation degree is good, it is suitable for less complicated popular songs, and it is more resistant to listening.

ES100: The sound is relatively clean and cold, the sound field is one circle larger than BTR3K, the analytical power is high, the separation degree is good, and the processing of complex music is better, but the disadvantage is that the sound is slightly dry and fatigue will occur after listening for a long time.

I personally prefer ES100, it has a more playable APP, cleaner sound bottom, higher analysis and larger sound field, but the workmanship is slightly cheaper. Although BTR3K has good workmanship, the sound quality performance does not surprise me. What I feel is that the density is higher, the analysis is slightly warmer, and the sound field performance is disappointing.

equipment is generally used for listening. I hope all manufacturers can make more efforts on sound and then add icing on the cake.

Author: What Is Worth Buying 2020-04-21 21:01:32

website: https://post.smzdm.com/p/az5e5l80/