11. The comparisons between FT3 32Ω, FT3 350Ω versions and FT5

The FT3 32Ω and 350Ω versions, in addition to impedance differences, voice coil materials, diaphragm materials and tuning style are relatively different. The 350 Ω high-impedance version could access to a blacker background. What's more, due to the need for a larger driving power, the deeper potential of FT3 350 ohm version could be dug , to get a larger soundstage performance, deeper low-frequency, and the performance of the relatively loose, natural.

Comparing with the 350Ω version, the FT3 32Ω the high-frequency resolution relative convergence, focus more on the sense of presence in the low-frequency.low-frequency volume, strength, speed and elasticity have been improved, , with faster recovery. As for the mid-frequency vocals, compared to the 350Ω version, the positioning is forward, the vocal density of all the enhancement, the sound is relatively warmer, more suitable for the interpretation of pop music.

As a Planar Magnetic Headphones, the FT5 has the high-frequency resolution and wide sound field performance which planar headphone should have. The high-frequency is soft and delicate. Compare with the dynamic headphone the FT5 has a wider range, three-frequency energy distribution is more balanced.As for tuning style, vocal positioning is relatively more prominent than the rich, more suitable for vocals, pop music.